Deletion log | TYPE-MOON Wiki

Below is a list of the most recent deletions.

14:11, 16 December 2025 GuessWhoYoutube talk contribs deleted page Interstellar Voyage Engine (content was: "#REDIRECTKukulkan (Lostbelt)#Combat", and the only contributor was "GuessWhoYoutube" (talk))
01:12, 16 December 2025 EGGS talk contribs deleted page File:Ideals.png (content was: "{{Delete}}")
23:52, 15 December 2025 FANDOMbot talk contribs deleted page File:Delightful battle.png (Violation of Fandom's Terms of Use)
23:46, 15 December 2025 FANDOMbot talk contribs deleted page File:Lady spinel training.png (Violation of Fandom's Terms of Use)
23:33, 15 December 2025 FANDOMbot talk contribs deleted page File:Fun with grandad.png (Violation of Fandom's Terms of Use)
13:55, 15 December 2025 GotenSakurauchi talk contribs deleted page File:Gensai02.jpeg (Cleanup)
13:47, 15 December 2025 SOAP Bot talk contribs deleted page File:Morgan1.jpeg (Automated deletion of pages by Morganisbest)
13:47, 15 December 2025 SOAP Bot talk contribs deleted page File:Morgan2.jpeg (Automated deletion of pages by Morganisbest)
13:47, 15 December 2025 SOAP Bot talk contribs deleted page File:Morgan03.jpeg (Automated deletion of pages by Morganisbest)
13:47, 15 December 2025 SOAP Bot talk contribs deleted page File:Gensai01.jpeg (Automated deletion of pages by Morganisbest)
04:47, 15 December 2025 FANDOMbot talk contribs deleted page File:MorganC107.jpeg (Violation of Fandom's Terms of Use)
04:45, 15 December 2025 FANDOMbot talk contribs deleted page File:Morgan01.jpg (Violation of Fandom's Terms of Use)
22:01, 14 December 2025 The Lord Reader talk contribs deleted page File:Tsukihime Remake Arcueid art 4.png (Housekeeping)
22:01, 14 December 2025 The Lord Reader talk contribs deleted page File:Tsukihime Remake Arcueid art 3.png (Housekeeping)
22:01, 14 December 2025 The Lord Reader talk contribs deleted page File:Tsukihime Remake Arcueid art 2.jpg (Housekeeping)
22:01, 14 December 2025 The Lord Reader talk contribs deleted page File:Tsukihime Remake Arcueid art 1.png (Housekeeping)
18:02, 14 December 2025 FANDOMbot talk contribs deleted page File:Morgan1.jpeg (Violation of Fandom's Terms of Use)
17:52, 14 December 2025 FANDOMbot talk contribs deleted page File:Morgan01.jpeg (Violation of Fandom's Terms of Use)
23:45, 9 December 2025 EGGS talk contribs deleted page File:Horse cleaning session.png (content was: "Artoria tends to her steed.", and the only contributor was "KindleCamelEasy" (talk))
23:45, 9 December 2025 EGGS talk contribs deleted page File:Dun.png
23:15, 9 December 2025 FANDOMbot talk contribs deleted page File:Horse.png (Violation of Fandom's Terms of Use)
15:06, 8 December 2025 GuessWhoYoutube talk contribs deleted page Boundary Gorge, Heaven's Thunder Palace (content was: "#REDIRECTEreshkigal Alter#Boundary Gorge, Heaven's Thunder Palace", and the only contributor was "GuessWhoYoutube" (talk))
12:55, 7 December 2025 GuessWhoYoutube talk contribs deleted page Smocking Mirror (content was: "#REDIRECTTezcatlipoca#Smocking Mirror Category:Terminology in Fate/Grand Order", and the only contributor was "GuessWhoYoutube" (talk))
13:02, 6 December 2025 GuessWhoYoutube talk contribs deleted page Metztliapan: Lake Texcoco (content was: "#REDIRECT Lake of the Moon", and the only contributor was "GuessWhoYoutube" (talk))
01:33, 5 December 2025 Floofous talk contribs deleted redirect Kurokumo by overwriting (Deleted to make way for move from "Black Cloud")
14:46, 4 December 2025 EGGS talk contribs deleted page File:QinLiangyuCowGirl.jpg (content was: "{{Delete}}")
13:06, 24 November 2025 GuessWhoYoutube talk contribs deleted page Tyranosaurus Rex (content was: "#REDIRECTDinosaur#Tyranosaurus Category:Dinosaurs", and the only contributor was "GuessWhoYoutube" (talk))
11:48, 24 November 2025 GuessWhoYoutube talk contribs deleted page Huitzilopochtli (content was: "#REDIRECT Huitzilopochtli (disambiguation)", and the only contributor was "GuessWhoYoutube" (talk))
11:29, 24 November 2025 GuessWhoYoutube talk contribs deleted page Deteroration (Age of Gods) (content was: "#REDIRECTEarth#Deteroration", and the only contributor was "GuessWhoYoutube" (talk))
13:17, 16 November 2025 The Lord Reader talk contribs deleted page File:FSFKPFCollabVisual.png (Please indicate a picture is to be deleted when you remove it from the page it's used on for a new one)
03:47, 14 November 2025 The Lord Reader talk contribs deleted page File:AslaugRomancia3.png (content was: "{{Delete}}", and the only contributor was "Floofous" (talk))
01:08, 14 November 2025 The Lord Reader talk contribs deleted page File:The Red Dragon from Dragonkind (リュウシュ, Ryushu) in Fate-Grand Order.webp (Housekeeping: Bad file format and bad title)
23:12, 9 November 2025 The Lord Reader talk contribs deleted page File:MechaEli.jpg (Duplicated/superseded file: Once again image changed with no followup work done to keep track of the replaced picture)
23:12, 9 November 2025 The Lord Reader talk contribs deleted page File:MechaEliMkII.jpg (Duplicated/superseded file: Once again image changed with no followup work done to keep track of the replaced picture)
21:51, 30 October 2025 EGGS talk contribs deleted page User blog:Jhad777/The Hypocrisy of Rin Tohsaka Fans and the Disgraceful Treatment of Artoria Pendragon (content was: "It’s been going on for years — the deliberate undermining and misrepresentation of Artoria Pendragon, the Fate Route, and Shirou x Artoria as a romantic pairing. And frankly, it’s reached a level of absurdity that’s impossible to ignore. We have so-called “fans” — mostly those who obsessively worship Rin Tohsaka and the Unlimited Blade Works route — who hypocr...", and the only contributor was "Jhad777" (talk))
21:51, 30 October 2025 EGGS talk contribs deleted page User blog:Jhad777/Why I Hate Rin Tohsaka—and Why She’s a Textbook Mary Sue (content was: "Let’s cut through the noise: Rin Tohsaka is not the smart, balanced, well-written heroine people claim she is, and it’s time to stop pretending. Rin Tohsaka is not just overrated—she’s a Mary Sue, plain and simple. And not just any Mary Sue. She’s ''the'' poster child of the “perfect girl” syndrome that’s infecting anime and manga (just like how it has infected...", and the only contributor was "Jhad777" (talk))
21:51, 30 October 2025 EGGS talk contribs deleted page User blog:Jhad777/Fate/stay night and the Feminist Fraud: How Rin Tohsaka Was Deified and Shirou Emiya Was Destroyed (content was: "We live in an era where emotional abuse is rebranded as strength, where kindness is mocked as weakness, and where virtue in men is no longer admired but actively condemned. The ideological agent behind this inversion is modern feminism—not the classical liberal ideal of equal treatment, but the weaponized, self-serving movement that now pervades media, culture, and storytell...", and the only contributor was "Jhad777" (talk))
21:51, 30 October 2025 EGGS talk contribs deleted page User blog:Jhad777/Why I Hate Rin Tohsaka — And Why She’s a Textbook Mary Sue (content was: "Let’s get one thing out of the way: I love ''Fate/stay night''. I respect Kinoko Nasu’s original visual novel and appreciate the universe’s depth when it isn’t drowning in its own metaphysical nonsense. But what I absolutely ''cannot'' stomach anymore is the '''insufferable cult-like worship''' of Rin Tohsaka and the blind reverence surrounding ''Unlimited Blade Works'...", and the only contributor was "Jhad777" (talk))
21:50, 30 October 2025 EGGS talk contribs deleted page User blog:Jhad777/Why I Hate the Rin Tohsaka and UBW Fandom (content was: "Let’s get one thing out of the way: I love ''Fate/stay night''. I respect Kinoko Nasu’s original visual novel and appreciate the universe’s depth when it isn’t drowning in its own metaphysical nonsense. But what I absolutely ''cannot'' stomach anymore is the '''insufferable cult-like worship''' of Rin Tohsaka and the blind reverence surrounding ''Unlimited Blade Works'...", and the only contributor was "Jhad777" (talk))
21:50, 30 October 2025 EGGS talk contribs deleted page User blog:Jhad777/Why a Fate Route Anime Remake Still Matters (content was: "=== The Fate Route Deserves Better === The ''Fate Route'' — the original route, the beating heart of ''Fate/stay night'' — is left to rot in the shadows. The fact that this route hasn’t been given a proper modern anime by Ufotable is a travesty. It’s the most emotionally grounded, it’s where Shirou’s ideals are challenged by someone noble and pure, not cynical and...", and the only contributor was "Jhad777" (talk))
21:50, 30 October 2025 EGGS talk contribs deleted page User blog:Jhad777/The Fate Route Anime Adaptation Controversy – Why the Excuses Don’t Hold Up (Version 2) (content was: "The Fate/stay night fandom has long been plagued by a strange double standard when it comes to anime adaptations. Unlimited Blade Works fans, Rin Tohsaka fans, and Shirou × Rin shippers seem to dominate much of the online conversation, often acting as though the Fate Route — the original, foundational storyline — is somehow less deserving of a modern, high-quality adaptat...", and the only contributor was "Jhad777" (talk))
21:50, 30 October 2025 EGGS talk contribs deleted page User blog:Jhad777/Why the Fate Route Deserves a Remake (Version 2) (content was: "In the world of ''Fate/stay night'', the original ''Fate'' route—the heart and soul of Kinoko Nasu’s magnum opus—has long been neglected by mainstream anime culture. Overshadowed by Ufotable’s Unlimited Blade Works (UBW) and the Heaven’s Feel (HF) trilogy, the ''Fate'' route remains the only part of the trilogy that has yet to receive a proper, modern, high-fidelity...", and the only contributor was "Jhad777" (talk))
21:50, 30 October 2025 EGGS talk contribs deleted page User blog:Jhad777/The Fate Route Anime Adaptation Controversy – Why the Excuses Don’t Hold Up (content was: "For nearly two decades now, Fate Route fans have been waiting — patiently, impatiently, hopefully, and sometimes bitterly — for a proper anime remake/reboot adaptation of the Fate Route in ''Fate/stay night''. And in all that time, the arguments against it have only gotten more unreasonable, more hypocritical, and more frustrating to deal with. Let’s get this out of the...", and the only contributor was "Jhad777" (talk))
21:49, 30 October 2025 EGGS talk contribs deleted page User blog:Jhad777/The Fate Route Anime Adaptation Controversy – Why the Excuses Don’t Hold Up (Version 3) (content was: "The Fate Route is the foundation of ''Fate/stay night'' — the original story that introduced us to Shirou Emiya, Artoria Pendragon, and their journey together. Yet, despite the overwhelming popularity of the franchise and multiple adaptations of other routes, the Fate Route has never received a proper modern adaptation. Instead, we’ve seen endless excuses and deflections...", and the only contributor was "Jhad777" (talk))
21:49, 30 October 2025 EGGS talk contribs deleted page User blog:Jhad777/The Fate Route Anime Adaptation Controversy – Why the Excuses Don’t Hold Up (Version 4) (content was: "For years, Fate/stay night’s Fate Route has been sidelined, disrespected, and treated like the unwanted stepchild of the franchise — and the excuses for why it can’t or shouldn’t get a proper modern anime adaptation are paper-thin. Worse, many of these “reasons” reek of bias, hypocrisy, and outright malice toward Artoria, Shirou, and their relationship. Let’s br...", and the only contributor was "Jhad777" (talk))
21:49, 30 October 2025 EGGS talk contribs deleted page User blog:Jhad777/Stop Pretending UBW Is the Only “True” Fate Route (content was: " = Stop Pretending UBW Is the Only “True” Fate Route = === ''A Rebuttal to Hypocritical Fans Who use Gatekeeping to attack other Fans of the Franchise'' === ---- == Introduction == There’s a frustrating trend among certain sections of the Fate fandom—particularly among diehard fans of the ''Unlimited Blade Works'' (UBW) route—that needs to be addressed. These indi...", and the only contributor was "Jhad777" (talk))
21:49, 30 October 2025 EGGS talk contribs deleted page User blog:Jhad777/The Fate Route Deserves Its Remake — And Why the Excuses Against It Collapse Under Scrutiny (content was: "For nearly two decades, the ''Fate/stay night'' franchise has grown into one of the most recognizable pillars of modern anime culture. Yet somehow, the very route that started it all — the Fate Route — remains without a faithful, high-quality adaptation. Instead of acknowledging this glaring omission, certain corners of the fandom — particularly those who idolize Rin Toh...", and the only contributor was "Jhad777" (talk))
21:49, 30 October 2025 EGGS talk contribs deleted page User blog:Jhad777/Stop Pretending UBW Is the Only “True” Fate Route (Version 2) (content was: "It’s time someone said it: '''Unlimited Blade Works fans have turned their preferences into a destructive cult''' that poisons discourse within the ''Fate'' community. For years, UBW diehards have pushed the idea that their route is the “true” one — the only one worthy of serious adaptation or recognition. This narrative isn’t just arrogant, it’s dishonest, hypocri...", and the only contributor was "Jhad777" (talk))
21:48, 30 October 2025 EGGS talk contribs deleted page User blog:Jhad777/Why the Claim “People Who Hate Tsunderes Are Tsunderes Themselves” Is Utter Nonsense (content was: " One of the laziest and most immature accusations in anime fandom discourse is the smug claim: ''“If you hate Tsunderes, that just means you’re a Tsundere yourself.”'' On the surface, it sounds clever. In reality, it falls apart the moment you give it even a second of thought. Let’s break down why this argument is not only false, but hypocritical — and why the peo...", and the only contributor was "Jhad777" (talk))
21:48, 30 October 2025 EGGS talk contribs deleted page User blog:Jhad777/Why the Claim “People Who Hate Tsunderes Are Tsunderes Themselves” Is Utter Nonsense (Version 2) (content was: "One of the laziest and most immature accusations in anime fandom discourse is the smug claim: ''“If you hate tsunderes, that just means you’re a tsundere yourself.”'' On the surface, it sounds clever. In reality, it falls apart the moment you give it even a second of thought. Let’s break down why this argument is not only false, but hypocritical — and why the people...", and the only contributor was "Jhad777" (talk))