With Tsukihime -A piece of blue glass moon- and Melty Blood: Type Lumina on the horizon, we should determine how to format the articles. These games appear to have a completely new continuity separate from the older games (even taking place in a different city), so we'll likely want to separate the new from the old seeing as it's not going to simply be a case of updating lore.
Page splits
All characters and major lore should get their own pages.
- Shiki Tohno and Shiki Tohno (Remake)
- Arcueid Brunestud and Arcueid Brunestud (Remake)
- The Twenty-seven Dead Apostle Ancestors and The Twenty-seven Dead Apostle Ancestors (Remake)
For lore that's only slightly tweaked, we'll probably just do small sections.
Formatting
As to how these should be formatted,
- ARTICLE NAME (Remake)
- ARTICLE NAME/Remake
- ARTICLE NAME (blue glass moon)
- ARTICLE NAME/blue glass moon
- ARTICLE NAME (TsukiR)
- ARTICLE NAME/TsukiR
- Other suggestions
Headers
Should we do some kind of header at the top of old lore articles saying as much? TM has no real defined canon, so it'd be more of something like "This page reflects the original release of Tsukihime in 2000. It may/does not reflect the remake Tsukihime -A piece of blue glass moon-." Those feel kind of tacky, but do want to avoid confusing people with two sets of lore.
- Can probably work out some sort of disambiguation template. I don't think it'd be too distracting and it's a good alternative to the tabs. Banksia (talk) 03:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Comments
Votes on article formatting and other general comments relating to the remake can be left here. EGGS (talk) 17:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
I do think that formatting should be "ARTICLE NAME/Remake" since it's easy to make pages that way and it can also direct you back to the main page as well. As for headers, I do think something like that should be added saying how the lore is different depending on which game it's covering. Khanetho417 (talk) 18:28, 26 March 2021 (UTC)