For moving forward with the Servant article renaming, it'd be best to figure out a good format for the introductory sentence. All regular HGW Servants primarily go by class name, so that needs to be mentioned in the introductory sentence regardless. I'd like things to be consistent throughout all the articles.

So we have:

  • Option 4:
    • Rename, but otherwise leave formatting unchanged.

Comments

Please list preference or feel free to propose better alternatives. EGGS (talk) 18:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

I prefer to take out the Class Name altogether but no fuss either way. Banksia (talk) 09:26, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Due to Servants like the FSN Servants being more associated with the class name than their true names (Saber especially), they definitely need to be mentioned in some capacity. With that, it makes more sense to be consistent throughout all articles. I'm thinking probably going with Option 2 so the context of Class Name is linked in the lead. EGGS (talk) 17:31, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Man I take back the "no fuss either way" because seeing it in multiple articles, it really looks redundant. Banksia (talk) 23:23, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
TM JP servant temp

Is it worth reworking the infobox templates? I nabbed this from the JP wiki as an example. Banksia (talk) 09:26, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

I don't think we need to do Servant-only main infoboxes considering over half the traits are shared by all characters in general, but adding writer and designer to the ServantTop might is probably a good idea. Adding "actor" to the general infobox might be good too seeing as plays are becoming more common. EGGS (talk) 17:31, 8 December 2020 (UTC)