Is there some specific reason this needs an article? There's really no content to push it past a paragraph, so placing it within Noble Phantasm seems like the best option. EGGS 16:59, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

When I reverted it, I was more concerned about the format of it's incorporation into NP article and was planing to fix it myself later, but I seem to have forgotten to address it (sorry about that). Basically, the BP should at least get it's own titled paragraph inside NP article so that redirect can work directly to that, and not to the entire NP article.
Also, the sourced part should be left verbatim, imo. --Azaghal 21:47, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
"Is there some specific reason this needs an article?" there always is, your merging-happy idea is fucking retarded. --Byakko 01:48, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
No it's not. --Blank 22:09, September 13, 2015 (UTC)